By the time the evening ended, Hester had mentally drafted the Retirement Bill of Rights. On his way home, he pulled out a note card and wrote down four short statementsOpens pdf to align all parties around a set of core principles.
“No matter how we approach the issue, we all share the same goal,” Hester says. “And everyone—policymakers and employers alike—can do something and together as one coalition, we can close the gaps that stand in the way of that goal.”
Policy progress
Legislators on both sides of the aisle continue to push for new policies designed to help workers save for retirement and allow them to turn their savings into retirement income. The first SECURE Act, passed December 2019, cleared some of the hurdles employers face when choosing annuity providers for their retirement plans. Lawmakers looking to build on that policy introduced the Lifetime Income for Employees Act in June 2023, which would make it easier for employers to include a broader array of annuity options in the default investment choice.
Another bipartisan bill announced in July 2023, the Auto Reenroll Act of 2023, clarifies current ERISA safe harbors and encourages plan sponsors to reenroll any nonparticipating employees once every three years, unless they opt out again. Many see these bills as a reaffirmation of the importance of automatic enrollment and lifetime income to build retirement readiness.
“Policy changes are an important step to create access to the tools workers need to overcome the big challenges we face when it comes to retirement,” says Chris Spence, managing director of government relations at TIAA. “But policy gets us only part way there.”
Commonsense solutions at work
The Retirement Bill of Rights arrived at an important inflection point for many employers and consultants. The recent passage of SECURE 2.0, along with the original SECURE in December 2019, brought a tidal wave of new opportunities—more than 140 new items to evaluate—some optional, some mandatory. All of it forced many employers to reexamine their plan design and ask themselves some hard questions about their priorities.
“A lot of goes into plan design decisions, not the least of which are the fiduciary responsibilities to the plan and the employees,” says Jill Popovich, senior managing director of TIAA Retirement Solutions. “The Retirement Bill of Rights adds a different lens to that decision-making process. It helps us look critically at the retirement plan and find ways to deliver an even better plan for the employees.”
“For example, many institutions offer generous employer contributions with no strings attached,” Popovich explains. “And some have long wondered whether that plan design will help employees save enough for retirement. The Retirement Bill of Rights helps gets that conversation underway.”
Using plan data in the TIAA Plan Outcome Assessment can help identify those areas for improvement, especially when it comes to participation, contributions, and number of participants invested in the default. It’s also a matter of asking the right questions to see how the plan can do more to help champion workers’ rights (See below).
“This is an important moment for retirement plans,” Popovich says. “The Retirement Bill of Rights encourages all of us to find ways to be part of the solution—big or small—to deliver better retirements for American workers.”